Arbor Technology ITX-i45M2 Manual de usuario Pagina 22

  • Descarga
  • Añadir a mis manuales
  • Imprimir
  • Pagina
    / 32
  • Tabla de contenidos
  • MARCADORES
  • Valorado. / 5. Basado en revisión del cliente
Vista de pagina 21
AMD EMBEDDED SOLUTIONS GUIDE
22
JULY 2013
The Problem with Bifurcation
Handheld portable HMI devices are
frequently tethered (albeit wirelessly) to a
central control panel. And although these
portable systems are designed to be used in-
dependently of the central panel in a physi-
cal sense, operationally the portable device is
designed to serve as a natural extension of the
central system. In some cases, these wirelessly
tethered devices are designed to visually rep-
licate the master HMI display so as to enable
an operator to carry the device through the
production line without sacrificing visual-
ization and/or management capabilities. As
such, there are clear benefits in maintaining
a single, scalable underlying processing plat-
form across both types of systems to ensure a
consistent look and feel between them.
For the HMI system vendor, this single
platform approach yields greater design effi-
ciency and significantly leaner cost structures,
enabling designers to develop and maintain a
single unified software solution and hardware
architecture that can be scaled across the full
product line. ese efficiencies are even more
pronounced on the embedded x86 platform,
given the inherent PC-compatibility and
rich ecosystem of industry-standard, x86-
optimized software, applications, operat-
ing systems and development environments
available to designers. x86 support also con-
tributes to greater interoperability with the
enterprise IT network, which introduces ad-
ditional benefits for applications such as secu-
rity and antivirus, system maintenance and
remote administration, helping to integrate
factory floor and distributed control system
communication with an IT infrastructure
utilizing standard networking protocols.
For HMI system operators, consolidat-
ing on a single processing platform helps
provide a consistent user experience across
handheld portable and fixed-installation
HMI panels. is consistency may make
learning and operating these systems, via a
familiar GUI and feature set, faster and eas-
ier for users. e resulting productivity and
precision control gains can be significant.
High-Performance Graphics
across the Board(s)
While lower-performing, mobile-opti-
mized processors can be adequate for some
handheld portable HMI devices, the graph-
Enabling Consistent
HMI Experiences
from Portable,
Handheld to High-
Performance Panels
I
n the industrial control and automa-
tion domain, continued advancements
in human machine interface (HMI)
technology are driving huge gains in
productivity and usability. With each
new generation of HMI systems, conven-
tional “knob and button” operator controls
are being phased out in favor of touchscreen
interfaces that in many ways mimic the con-
sumer smartphone/tablet experience.
ese software reconfigurable multi-
touch HMI panels are designed in part to re-
duce hardware dependencies between the con-
trol panel and the embedded system, allowing
HMI panel designers to more easily modify
the functionality of the system and enhance
the interface over timesimilar to the way in
which smartphone designers have jettisoned
most physical push button controls in favor of
reconfigurable touchscreen interfaces.
With this continued evolution toward
touchscreen HMI panels, portable handheld
HMI devices are emerging as a valuable com-
plement to traditional fixed-installation HMI
panels, giving system operators greater flexibil-
ity and mobility on the factory floor, with wire-
less connectivity to the central control panel.
With support for consumer smartphone/tablet-
like interfaces, operators can navigate these
portable HMI devices much like they would
their personal devices, using intuitive gesture-
based input to navigate the GUI (Figure 1).
e advent of portable handheld HMIs
has created a dilemma for HMI system de-
signers, however. ese designers are tempted
to adopt mobile-optimized, low-power
processing platforms for this specific class
of HMI device, while utilizing higher-per-
forming processor platforms for more graph-
ics- and compute-intensive fixed-installation
HMI panels. is approach introduces sig-
nificant tradeoffs for HMI system designers
and users alike. Here we’ll look at some of the
pitfalls of this approach, and also the associ-
ated merits of Accelerated Processing Units
(APUs) as a unified, scalable processing plat-
form appropriate for both portable handheld
devices and fixed-installation HMI panels.
With the advent of mobile HMI devices, designers can benet
from a single CPU/graphics processing architecture that can offer
hardware and software consistency from small handheld displays to
full-sized HMI and IT systems.
by Cameron Swen, AMD Embedded Solutions
Vista de pagina 21
1 2 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 31 32

Comentarios a estos manuales

Sin comentarios